| The
whispersinthecorridors Online Print from origin : whispersinthecorridors.com > Archive >16th Jun 2011 Thursday |
|
Simply superb. Everyone in the Government & Corporate sector access WHISPERS. Doing a fantastic job. I wish your viewership will cross all records.
H Bharali
Aaj Ki Aawaz
Bharat Kumar
Contact-suresh.mehrotra@yahoo.com> & <mehrotra.suresh@gmail.com> Youngsters want Railway Ministry for Congress
BUREAUCRACY Will Gairola be new Secretary IT ?
Ajit Lal is new Chairman of JIC
Veena Ish to be Joint Secretary HRD Chandrasekhar appointed Vice Chairman State
Planning Board Kerala Why did Subodh Agrawal meet Chidambaram ? Jha to be Director (Technical) MECL
Bhagavantha Rao to be MD,State Bank of Hyderabad
Nandkeolyar posted as Director General of
Audit Central Receipt
Khullar appointed Mission Director NFSM
Majhi to be JS Agriculture
Pradeep Yadav resumes his duty
10 IPS officers allocated Bihar cadre
Rajendra Upadhyay is Prasar Bharti Correpondent
in Kabul
G Venkatesh appointed as Director, Heavy Industries
West Bengal Govt recalls Barun Roy
Who will succeed Mohta in London ?
One Director level vacancy in Heavy Industry
Department
Upadhyay model to fight AIDS being studied
by developing nations After eight years Bihar govt asked to provide
security to IPS officer IPS postings in TamilNadu IAS shake-up in Andhra Pradesh IPS changes in West Bengal IAS postings in Punjab IAS reshuffle in West Bengal Basu to be Director (Technical) CMPDIL (UPDATED) DEBATE
Next Lok Sabha-Congress and BJP to get less
than 100 seats ? mehrotra.suresh@gmail.com or suresh.mehrotra@yahoo.com CORPORATE Rani George is Diector, Tourism, Govt of Kerala Garg resigns as Alternate Director, Asian
Hotels (East) Ltd Kodali resigns as Non Exec. Director, Priyadarshini
Spinning Mills Ltd HOV Services may re-appoint Whole-time directors Lekhwani appointed Company Secy. Parekh Aluminex
Ltd Garg appointed Addl. Director, Bihar Sponge
Iron Ltd Chordia appointed Addl. Director, Gokul Refoils
& Solvent Ltd Parikh resigns as Company Secy. Birla Shloka
Edutech Ltd Mukhopadhyay resigns as CFO, Yash Papers Ltd Arora appointed Addl. Director, Times Guaranty
Ltd Rao resigns as Director, Times Guaranty Ltd Ranade appointed Company Secy. Times Guaranty
Ltd
This going to be an election against corrupt people and parties. The third front parties like JD(U) and some regional set ups will make the government and would be working for people. It is JD(U).
Kunwar Ram Sumiran
An expert in not taking decisions
I entirely agree that many Joint Secretaries do not take any initiatives and some of them do not even take any decisions. A classic example of this was a joint Secretary in the Ministry of Urban Development who was an expert in not taking decisions. He will either send the file back with some irrelevant query or keep the issue pending on one pretext or the other.
Pulipra
Problem of India's working women
This is to draw the attention of the readers of this website to the problem of India's working women. India has been rated the 4th most difficult place for women to be born in. This is the most shameful state of affair. After 60 years of Independence, the patriarchal society of India has not managed to create a space for its womenfolk. Thus women who step out of their homes to work do so in the face of grave danger and adversities. Every working woman has to perform double the duties that their men folk do. They are perforce wives, daughters and primary care-givers. When they step into the work-force, they give away the best 08-10 hours of their day to the earning of the bread and butter. When they get home there is not a minute of rest they have because their primary role has to be performed. in this context if the Government of India wants to encourage more women to join the work-force it has to give it certain benefits. The Child Care Leave is one such benefit. Under no circumstance should this benefit be changed or revised. Tjis is an appeal to Smt. Sonia Gandhi to understand the travails of being a working woman and allow no tinkering by the DoPT.
Shubha Mazumdar
Civil Society is legally defined
Many ministers are aggressively demanding to know who is the Civil Society. Had they cared to study the law of defamation, libel, slander, scandal, vilification and rumour mongering, they would never have demanded to know any further. Fortunately, these laws were framed and implemented by the British who never question if Gandhi(Only Mahatma Gandhi) represented the nation or civil society. By the rhetoric deployed by these ministers, Gandhi did not represent the population of whole of India but Jinna did, as ultimately the British stand was vindicated and so India was ripped into two from the middle! The law of defamation stands on the tested premise that a statement of the arraigned lowers the reputation of the petitioner in the "estimation of the right thinking people of the society". Now, are ministers the only right thinking people of the society? They have demonstrated such blatant ill-will and animosity against the civil society that they attract the charge of violation of their oath of office, which vouched that the person shall discharge his/her official functions without fear or favour, love or ill- will. But they are behaving like dictators without as much caring to exercise reasonable restrictions on their expressions, using words most unbecoming of a minister, since they enjoy the powers of the Executive(which includes the power to reward & punish or remit). The civil society enjoys no such powers. Why , then, should the ministers use harsh words, threaten members of the civil society? Their claim that the parliament is the only forum for ideas of public good is terribly flawed. The parliament is only supreme, not sovereign. So even the elected members are supreme in that sense, but it is "we, the people of India", who are sovereign. If the civil society is giving some feedback to the parliament or the Executive, it should be thankfully acknowledged and acted upon to the extent possible.Is it beyond the power, mandate or lawful duty of the government to remove corruption or bring back the black money stacked abroad? No, no, no. It is within the powers of the government to yield results even before the Lokpal Bill is passed. The question is: Does the government want to do so?
M L Gupta
Strange happenings
Strange things are happening in the country. There seems to be a competition in attacking whom you do not like with macabre, indecent and untrue words. See how Anna Hazare is being targetted. 'He is a mask of RSS. He is a dictator and he represents nobody'. One spokesperson of the ruling party has dubbed the entire attempt of the civil society in drafting a strong Lokpal bill as the tyranny of the 'unelected and the nonelectable' He forgets that that these are the people who have elected them into power and they continue to have the right to vote them out. Does he mean that once elected the so-called representatives of the people can do anything and should not be questioned by those who elected them. I think in the face of this attitude we should amend the constitution to provide for the right to recall a member of parliament if he or she fails to deliver or indulges in corruption. We also know how every person is not elected through a foolproof fair polls(notwithstanding our Election Commission's commendable efforts for that).money and muscle power has been used by some occupying the hallowed hall of Lok Sabha while Rajya Sabha memberships are up for favour and sale. Only the other day the chief minister of Tamil Nadu raked up once again the suspicion about the election of one of the important functionary of Government who incidentally is a part of the drafting committee of Lokpal bill representing Government. It is nothing but arrogance that makes these men and women harp on their elected status vis-a -vis the nonelected members of civil society who are really fighting people's battles.
Aarti Khosla
Recognition of Civil Society!
It seems that 90% people in India do not know what is civil society and who made them to become violent on any issue without having put forth the issue within and before the elected members of the Parliament, before coming into public with open opposition in biased attitude. May it be Anna, or anyone else, what right they have to blame the government without discussing and going into the modalities and pros and cons of the "so called - Kaladhan". No doubt that people have not understood about the Kaladhan lying out of the country and belonging to various politicians, bureaucrats, business personalities etc. etc. but still Civil Society should, first clarify the public at large that what is the via media to bring back that kaladhan as National Property. Even Media has also not put such a question before Anna and others, who claims as above public and above parliament to raise such issue which is not yet clarified by them to the public by distributing public statement as to how that Dhan is immediately possible as they feel and even Baba Ramdev went on fast on this issue with the pretext that government must bring back that dhan within a month or immediately. There must be some bilateral agreements between country to country. Regarding BJP, they speak on this issue with just little voice as if they have put forward Baba Ramdev or Anna as they "Bali ka Bakra. Why should BJP and other Political parties do not make logical statement on such issue and avoid violence and Dharnas in the country. Educative attitude by such parties will better for the people to understand clearly about Kaladhan which is not just fixed with other countries with the approval of the present government or past governments. Where was BJP when it was on rule in the Country and before coming to power they Agenda was very clear about many things including status of J&K. But even they did not found fair on making their promises to the countrymen. I must appeal Anna and Baba Ramdev and others who raise their voice that the issue may be discussed in the Special Session of Parliament exclusively on for two weeks on Kaladhan and Anna and Ramdev must be special invitee to give their clear and fundamentsl statements in the parliament for taking up the debate. In case that all parliamentarians feel that the issue is raised with logic and names of the specific people whose Kaladhan is lying in Swiss, Mauritius or other countries be published and submitted before Speaker in Lok Sabha and Chairman in Rajya Sabha . Total transparency by the Anna and Ramdev with other backing political parties must bring the names whatsoever, whosoever to make the public realise that Anna, Baba and other parties are logical in bringing the issue before public.
H S Bhalla
People supported them !
Let people media or journalists say anything, both Anna Hazare and Ramdev baba took up mass movement against corruption. Public whole heartedly accepted their struggle and are supporting it. The result will be all incumbent governments will be thrown out immaterial of which party in power.
NVK Prabhakar
Lot of outstanding issues
This is regarding the latest instructions of DoPT regarding stepping up of pay to the officials in the entire CSSS with the Stenographers Grade 'D' promoted after 1/1/2006. There are lot of outstanding issues regarding the entitlement of stepping up e.g. whether the Personal Assistants (Ad-hoc)is entitled for stepping up, whether the officials who were awarded ACP/MACP are eligible for claiming stepping up and whether the officials who were P.A. (Ad-hoc) with ACP are also eligible for stepping up and the last one the how to get the information for determining the junior officials against whom in the entire CSSS cadre can be mentioned for stepping up the senior officials etc. There is an urgent need to clarify all these points without which the latest instructions of DP&T will be of no use.
V P Sharma
Pay Commission's mandate
Pay Commission has mandated difference of max. 2 years in promotion to various grades in central ministries. In railway ministry itself, there is difference of 3 years as IRSS-87,IRSSE-86,87,IRSEE-87 have not been promoted while in case of IRAS and IRTS, complete 89 batch officers have been promoted. This has happened due to step motherly treatment by higher ups in railway ministry. Very less ex-cadre posts like SDGM, ADRM, Computerisation have been given to these departments. There is lot of discontentment in officers of 87, 88 and 89 batch officers of these services.
Surinder RTI Are Ministers covered under definition of 'public servants'? The appellant desired copies of instruction under which Ministers are
covered under the definition of public servant and the rule under which
the Ministers could remain missing from their official duty for weeks
and devote themselves for their party works leaving behind their official
work unattended. He also wanted to know whether such prolonged absence
from official work could be treated as a part of their official duty
and whether a Minister could draw pay & perks for the period of
absence from official duty to attend personal or party work. The PIO
stated that as per records available there are no Comments The section 4 puts certain obligations on the public authority to pro-actively
disclose certain facts about themselves. The civil servants have been
at the receiving end for delay or absenteeism but the performance of
ministers has not been questioned. Would the RTI Mr. H.P. Sharma v. Cabinet Secretariat in CIC/SM/A/2011/000263/SG/12650
- Weekly article by Dr. (Mrs.) Anuradha Verma |
| Dr
Suresh Mehrotra has his lips sealed, if you have any whispers then send it to
us |
| ©
www.whispersinthecorridors.com. (ANN) All rights reserved. |